Distinct Neural Signatures of Outcome Monitoring After Selection and Execution Errors

Faisal Mushtaq, Samuel D. McDougle, Matt P. Craddock, Darius E. Parvin, Jack Brookes, Alexandre Schaefer, Mark Mon-Williams, Jordan A. Taylor, Richard B. Ivry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Losing a point in tennis could result from poor shot selection or faulty stroke execution. To explore how the brain responds to these different types of errors, we examined feedback-locked EEG activity while participants completed a modified version of a standard three-armed bandit probabilistic reward task. Our task framed unrewarded outcomes as the result of either errors of selection or errors of execution. We examined whether amplitude of a medial frontal negativity (the feedback-related negativity [FRN]) was sensitive to the different forms of error attribution. Consistent with previous reports, selection errors elicited a large FRN relative to rewards, and ampl i tude of thi s si gnal correl ated wi th behavi oral adjustment after these errors. A different pattern was observed in response to execution errors. These outcomes produced a larger FRN, a frontocentral attenuation in activity preceding this component, and a subsequent enhanced error positivity in parietal sites. Notably, the only correlations with behavioral adjustment were with the early frontocentral attenuation and amplitude of the parietal signal; FRN differences between execution errors and rewarded trials did not correlate with subsequent changes in behavior. Our findings highlight distinct neural correlates of selection and execution error processing, providing insight into how the brain responds to the different classes of error that determine future action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)748-765
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of cognitive neuroscience
Issue number5
StatePublished - Mar 31 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cognitive Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Distinct Neural Signatures of Outcome Monitoring After Selection and Execution Errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this