Discounting Future Green: Money Versus the Environment

David J. Hardisty, Elke U. Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

277 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 3 studies, participants made choices between hypothetical financial, environmental, and health gains and losses that took effect either immediately or with a delay of 1 or 10 years. In all 3 domains, choices indicated that gains were discounted more than losses. There were no significant differences in the discounting of monetary and environmental outcomes, but health gains were discounted more and health losses were discounted less than gains or losses in the other 2 domains. Correlations between implicit discount rates for these different choices suggest that discount rates are influenced more by the valence of outcomes (gains vs. losses) than by domain (money, environment, or health). Overall, results indicate that when controlling as many factors as possible, at short to medium delays, environmental outcomes are discounted in a similar way to financial outcomes, which is good news for researchers and policy makers alike.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-340
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume138
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience
  • General Psychology

Keywords

  • environment
  • health
  • intertemporal choice
  • money
  • temporal discounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discounting Future Green: Money Versus the Environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this