TY - JOUR
T1 - Dimensionality reduction for surrogate model construction for global sensitivity analysis
T2 - Comparison between active subspace and local sensitivity analysis
AU - Lin, Keli
AU - Zhou, Zijun
AU - Law, Chung K.
AU - Yang, Bin
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1831192 and 52076116 ). The work is supported by the Seed Fund of Shanxi Research Institute for Clean Energy, Tsinghua University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Combustion Institute
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Global sensitivity analysis of combustion kinetic models is time consuming, because numerous samples generated by kinetic model simulations within the uncertainty space of the input parameters are needed. To alleviate this problem, surrogate models are often adopted to replace the kinetic model to generate samples. Directly constructing surrogate models is difficult in high-dimensional systems, therefore, local sensitivity analysis is usually first performed to exclude unimportant parameters. However, local sensitivity analysis may cause inaccurate screening when the model is nonlinear and the uncertainties of the input parameters are large. To overcome this difficulty, we propose herein the active subspace-based surrogate model (ASSM) method, which uses the active subspace to transform the high-dimensional input to low-dimensional features and then maps these features to the model target. The entire parameters are included in the ASSM while the mapping relationship is fitted with low-dimensional features. The accuracy and the computational cost of the ASSM are compared with those of the local sensitivity-based surrogate model (LSSM) in the hydrogen and methanol combustion systems. The results show that the ASSM can improve the data utilization and lead to a lower computational cost compared to the LSSM when several targets are considered, because one kinetic model simulation can yield original samples for many model targets simultaneously for the ASSM. The global sensitivity analysis with the ASSM and the LSSM is compared in the hydrogen, methanol and n-decane combustion systems, and the results show that the ASSM could lead to more reliable sensitivity indices than the LSSM because the active subspace-based dimensionality reduction can prevent the possibility of missing important parameters by transforming the entire parameters to new features instead of excluding some parameters.
AB - Global sensitivity analysis of combustion kinetic models is time consuming, because numerous samples generated by kinetic model simulations within the uncertainty space of the input parameters are needed. To alleviate this problem, surrogate models are often adopted to replace the kinetic model to generate samples. Directly constructing surrogate models is difficult in high-dimensional systems, therefore, local sensitivity analysis is usually first performed to exclude unimportant parameters. However, local sensitivity analysis may cause inaccurate screening when the model is nonlinear and the uncertainties of the input parameters are large. To overcome this difficulty, we propose herein the active subspace-based surrogate model (ASSM) method, which uses the active subspace to transform the high-dimensional input to low-dimensional features and then maps these features to the model target. The entire parameters are included in the ASSM while the mapping relationship is fitted with low-dimensional features. The accuracy and the computational cost of the ASSM are compared with those of the local sensitivity-based surrogate model (LSSM) in the hydrogen and methanol combustion systems. The results show that the ASSM can improve the data utilization and lead to a lower computational cost compared to the LSSM when several targets are considered, because one kinetic model simulation can yield original samples for many model targets simultaneously for the ASSM. The global sensitivity analysis with the ASSM and the LSSM is compared in the hydrogen, methanol and n-decane combustion systems, and the results show that the ASSM could lead to more reliable sensitivity indices than the LSSM because the active subspace-based dimensionality reduction can prevent the possibility of missing important parameters by transforming the entire parameters to new features instead of excluding some parameters.
KW - Active subspace
KW - Dimensionality reduction
KW - Global sensitivity analysis
KW - High-dimensional system
KW - Surrogate model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107457860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107457860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111501
DO - 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111501
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107457860
SN - 0010-2180
VL - 232
JO - Combustion and Flame
JF - Combustion and Flame
M1 - 111501
ER -