TY - GEN
T1 - Differential privacy as a mutual information constraint
AU - Cuff, Paul
AU - Yu, Lanqing
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
PY - 2016/10/24
Y1 - 2016/10/24
N2 - Differential privacy is a precise mathematical constraint meant to ensure privacy of individual pieces of information in a database even while queries are being answered about the aggregate. Intuitively, one must come to terms with what differential privacy does and does not guarantee. For example, the definition prevents a strong adversary who knows all but one entry in the database from further inferring about the last one. This strong adversary assumption can be overlooked, resulting in misinterpretation of the privacy guarantee of differential privacy. Herein we give an equivalent definition of privacy using mutual information that makes plain some of the subtleties of differential privacy. The mutual-information differential privacy is in fact sandwiched between e-differential privacy and (e, <5)-differential privacy in terms of its strength. In contrast to previous works using unconditional mutual information, differential privacy is fundamentally related to conditional mutual information, accompanied by a maximization over the database distribution. The conceptual advantage of using mutual information, aside from yielding a simpler and more intuitive definition of differential privacy, is that its properties are well understood. Several properties of differential privacy are easily verified for the mutual information alternative, such as composition theorems.
AB - Differential privacy is a precise mathematical constraint meant to ensure privacy of individual pieces of information in a database even while queries are being answered about the aggregate. Intuitively, one must come to terms with what differential privacy does and does not guarantee. For example, the definition prevents a strong adversary who knows all but one entry in the database from further inferring about the last one. This strong adversary assumption can be overlooked, resulting in misinterpretation of the privacy guarantee of differential privacy. Herein we give an equivalent definition of privacy using mutual information that makes plain some of the subtleties of differential privacy. The mutual-information differential privacy is in fact sandwiched between e-differential privacy and (e, <5)-differential privacy in terms of its strength. In contrast to previous works using unconditional mutual information, differential privacy is fundamentally related to conditional mutual information, accompanied by a maximization over the database distribution. The conceptual advantage of using mutual information, aside from yielding a simpler and more intuitive definition of differential privacy, is that its properties are well understood. Several properties of differential privacy are easily verified for the mutual information alternative, such as composition theorems.
KW - Differential privacy
KW - Information theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995520598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995520598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2976749.2978308
DO - 10.1145/2976749.2978308
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84995520598
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security
SP - 43
EP - 54
BT - CCS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
PB - Association for Computing Machinery
T2 - 23rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2016
Y2 - 24 October 2016 through 28 October 2016
ER -