Abstract
This paper charts the concepts of grip and the bodily auxiliary in Maurice Merleau-Ponty to consider how they find expression in disability narratives. Arguing against the notion of “maximal grip” that some commentators have used to explicate intentionality in Merleau-Ponty, I argue that grip in his texts functions instead as a compensatory effort to stave off uncertainty, lack of mastery, and ambiguity. Nearly without exception in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, the mobilisation of “grip” is a signal of impending loss and is offered as a strategy for managing failure rather than as an example of sure-footed mastery. I read Merleau-Ponty alongside Mary Felstiner’s Out of Joint: A Public and Private Story of Arthritis to explore these other, attenuated dimensions of grip as an example of a way of thinking disabled embodiment otherwise.
Translated title of the contribution | The phenomenology of rheumatology: Disability, Merleau-Ponty and the fallacy of maximal grip |
---|---|
Original language | German |
Pages (from-to) | 908-919 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Maurice Merleau-Ponty
- bodily functions
- critical phenomenology
- disability
- embodiment