Die Phänomenologie der Rheumatologie: Behinderung, Merleau-Ponty und der Irrtum des maximalen Griffs

Translated title of the contribution: The phenomenology of rheumatology: Disability, Merleau-Ponty and the fallacy of maximal grip

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper charts the concepts of grip and the bodily auxiliary in Maurice Merleau-Ponty to consider how they find expression in disability narratives. Arguing against the notion of “maximal grip” that some commentators have used to explicate intentionality in Merleau-Ponty, I argue that grip in his texts functions instead as a compensatory effort to stave off uncertainty, lack of mastery, and ambiguity. Nearly without exception in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, the mobilisation of “grip” is a signal of impending loss and is offered as a strategy for managing failure rather than as an example of sure-footed mastery. I read Merleau-Ponty alongside Mary Felstiner’s Out of Joint: A Public and Private Story of Arthritis to explore these other, attenuated dimensions of grip as an example of a way of thinking disabled embodiment otherwise.

Translated title of the contributionThe phenomenology of rheumatology: Disability, Merleau-Ponty and the fallacy of maximal grip
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)908-919
Number of pages12
JournalDeutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Maurice Merleau-Ponty
  • bodily functions
  • critical phenomenology
  • disability
  • embodiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The phenomenology of rheumatology: Disability, Merleau-Ponty and the fallacy of maximal grip'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this