Abstract
Epistemologists often suppose that the extent to which evidence e confirms hypothesis H depends on probabilities involving e and H, and nothing more. We show experimentally that human reasoners sometimes violate this assumption.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 877-883 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Psychonomic Bulletin and Review |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2007 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)