TY - JOUR
T1 - Design Insights for Industrial CO2 Capture, Transport, and Storage Systems
AU - Gunawan, Tubagus Aryandi
AU - Gittoes, Lilianna
AU - Isaac, Cecelia
AU - Greig, Chris
AU - Larson, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2024/8/20
Y1 - 2024/8/20
N2 - We present methods and insights for the design of CO2 capture, transport, and storage systems for industrial facilities with a case study focus on Louisiana. Our analytical framework includes (1) evaluating the scale and concentration of capturable CO2 emissions at individual facilities for the purpose of estimating the cost of CO2 capture retrofits that utilize various energy supply sources to meet parasitic demands; (2) screening to identify potential CO2 storage sites and estimate their capacities, injectivities, and costs; and (3) designing cost-minimized trucking or pipeline infrastructure connecting CO2 capture plants with storage sites, considering existing land uses, demographics, and a variety of social and environmental justice factors. Estimated levelized costs of capture at Louisiana’s 190 industrial facilities range from below $50/tCO2 to above $500/tCO2, depending on facility-specific features. We identified 98 potential storage sites with storage costs ranging from $8 to $17/tCO2. We find that in most situations, pipelines are the least-costly mode of CO2 transport. When industrial facilities in a region share pipelines, aggregate pipeline mileage and average transport costs are dramatically lower than without sharing. Shared pipeline networks designed to avoid disadvantaged communities require right-of-way areas compared to those for networks that transect such communities, but result in 25% higher average per-tonne transport cost.
AB - We present methods and insights for the design of CO2 capture, transport, and storage systems for industrial facilities with a case study focus on Louisiana. Our analytical framework includes (1) evaluating the scale and concentration of capturable CO2 emissions at individual facilities for the purpose of estimating the cost of CO2 capture retrofits that utilize various energy supply sources to meet parasitic demands; (2) screening to identify potential CO2 storage sites and estimate their capacities, injectivities, and costs; and (3) designing cost-minimized trucking or pipeline infrastructure connecting CO2 capture plants with storage sites, considering existing land uses, demographics, and a variety of social and environmental justice factors. Estimated levelized costs of capture at Louisiana’s 190 industrial facilities range from below $50/tCO2 to above $500/tCO2, depending on facility-specific features. We identified 98 potential storage sites with storage costs ranging from $8 to $17/tCO2. We find that in most situations, pipelines are the least-costly mode of CO2 transport. When industrial facilities in a region share pipelines, aggregate pipeline mileage and average transport costs are dramatically lower than without sharing. Shared pipeline networks designed to avoid disadvantaged communities require right-of-way areas compared to those for networks that transect such communities, but result in 25% higher average per-tonne transport cost.
KW - CO capture
KW - CO storage
KW - CO transport
KW - hub design
KW - industry
KW - social and environmental justice
KW - time evolution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200633366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200633366&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.4c05484
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.4c05484
M3 - Article
C2 - 39105763
AN - SCOPUS:85200633366
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 58
SP - 14608
EP - 14617
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 33
ER -