Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration

Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner, Jon C. Pevehouse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examine how domestic political factors influence the type of regional integration arrangement (RIA) that states enter. States can pursue at least five types of RIA, in order of their depth of policy integration: preferential trade agreements, free trade areas, customs unions, common markets and economic unions. We argue that a country's regime type and the number of institutional 'veto players' strongly affect the type of arrangement that states choose. Democracies are more likely to form an RIA than other states, a tendency that becomes more pronounced as the proposed level of integration in an arrangement rises. However, all democracies are not the same. As the number of veto players rises, the likelihood of a democracy entering an RIA declines. Furthermore, veto players are expected to have a larger effect on the odds of a democracy forming an RIA, the greater is the extent of integration that the arrangement aims to achieve. A series of statistical tests, based on analysis of all pairs of countries from 1950 to 2000, support our arguments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-96
Number of pages30
JournalWorld Economy
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this