Democracy Before, In, and After Schumpeter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The classical model of democracy that Schumpeter criticizes is manufactured out of a variety of earlier ideas, not those of any one thinker or even one school of thought. His critique of the central ideals by which he defines the model—those of the common will and the common good—remains persuasive. People’s preferences are too messy and too manipulable to allow us to think that mass democracy can promote those ideals, as he defines them. Should we endorse his purely electoral model of democracy, then, and accept that people do not exercise any control over government? Not necessarily. We can expand democracy to include the constitutional and contestatory constraints that people impose on their rulers. We may hope that people can rely on such democratic controls to ensure that government operates by community standards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)492-504
Number of pages13
JournalCritical Review
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2017

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Keywords

  • Bodin
  • Hobbes
  • James Mill
  • Rousseau
  • Schumpeter
  • democracy
  • popular sovereignty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Democracy Before, In, and After Schumpeter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this