TY - JOUR
T1 - Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice
AU - Hertwig, Ralph
AU - Barron, Greg
AU - Weber, Elke U.
AU - Erev, Ido
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Eduard Brandstätter, Valerie Chase, Eric Johnson, Yaakov Kareev, Barbara Spellman, and Masanori Takezawa for helpful comments. We also thank Anita Todd for editing the manuscript, the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) for a grant to the first author (He 2768/6-1), and the Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for technical and financial support. Preparation of the manuscript was facilitated by a fellowship from the Institute for Advanced Study in Berlin to the third author.
PY - 2004/8
Y1 - 2004/8
N2 - When people have access to information sources such as newspaper weather forecasts, drug-package inserts, and mutual-fund brochures, all of which provide convenient descriptions of risky prospects, they can make decisions from description. When people must decide whether to back up their computer's hard drive, cross a busy street, or go out on a date, however, they typically do not have any summary description of the possible outcomes or their likelihoods. For such decisions, people can call only on their own encounters with such prospects, making decisions from experience. Decisions from experience and decisions from description can lead to dramatically different choice behavior. In the case of decisions from description, people make choices as if they overweight the probability of rare events, as described by prospect theory. We found that in the case of decisions from experience, in contrast, people make choices as if they underweight the probability of rare events, and we explored the impact of two possible causes of this underweighting - reliance on relatively small samples of information and overweighting of recently sampled information. We conclude with a call for two different theories of risky choice.
AB - When people have access to information sources such as newspaper weather forecasts, drug-package inserts, and mutual-fund brochures, all of which provide convenient descriptions of risky prospects, they can make decisions from description. When people must decide whether to back up their computer's hard drive, cross a busy street, or go out on a date, however, they typically do not have any summary description of the possible outcomes or their likelihoods. For such decisions, people can call only on their own encounters with such prospects, making decisions from experience. Decisions from experience and decisions from description can lead to dramatically different choice behavior. In the case of decisions from description, people make choices as if they overweight the probability of rare events, as described by prospect theory. We found that in the case of decisions from experience, in contrast, people make choices as if they underweight the probability of rare events, and we explored the impact of two possible causes of this underweighting - reliance on relatively small samples of information and overweighting of recently sampled information. We conclude with a call for two different theories of risky choice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043119771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043119771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x
DO - 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 15270998
AN - SCOPUS:4043119771
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 15
SP - 534
EP - 539
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 8
ER -