TY - GEN
T1 - Culture Clash! How Culture Trips Up Engineering Collaborations - and How to Fix It
AU - Vertesi, Janet
AU - Garson, Kyra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Every engineering company (private, public, governmental, or academic) has its own culture(s). And when multiple players collaborate on complex space projects, cultural differences come along for the ride. Since many engineers still view culture discussions as hand-wavey and/or imprecise, let's ask exactly what we mean by "culture"in the context of engineering? Which cultural factors trip up collaborations, no matter how well-meaning the participants are, and what can teams do about it? This paper draws on sociology and intercultural studies to identify four cultural factors that matter to technical teams - even when those teams are all based in one country. It shows how these cultural dimensions impact engineering teams' information-sharing, communications, decision-making, and risk management. When groups come together, clashes can produce technical confusion, attribution errors, and increased risk. A case study of intercultural training among two U.S. institutions on NASA's Europa Clipper mission demonstrates how teams can learn to communicate more effectively across divides and find joint solutions to technical issues. With precision, attention, and training, understanding of cultural factors in engineering communication can improve our collaboration experience and success across the aerospace sector.
AB - Every engineering company (private, public, governmental, or academic) has its own culture(s). And when multiple players collaborate on complex space projects, cultural differences come along for the ride. Since many engineers still view culture discussions as hand-wavey and/or imprecise, let's ask exactly what we mean by "culture"in the context of engineering? Which cultural factors trip up collaborations, no matter how well-meaning the participants are, and what can teams do about it? This paper draws on sociology and intercultural studies to identify four cultural factors that matter to technical teams - even when those teams are all based in one country. It shows how these cultural dimensions impact engineering teams' information-sharing, communications, decision-making, and risk management. When groups come together, clashes can produce technical confusion, attribution errors, and increased risk. A case study of intercultural training among two U.S. institutions on NASA's Europa Clipper mission demonstrates how teams can learn to communicate more effectively across divides and find joint solutions to technical issues. With precision, attention, and training, understanding of cultural factors in engineering communication can improve our collaboration experience and success across the aerospace sector.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193857660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193857660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521419
DO - 10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521419
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85193857660
T3 - IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings
BT - 2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference, AERO 2024
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference, AERO 2024
Y2 - 2 March 2024 through 9 March 2024
ER -