Abstract
Cross-cutting cleavages have long moderated party conflict in American politics and thereby contributed to democratic stability. Over recent decades, however, many of these cross-cutting cleavages have declined, sorting Americans into mutually antagonistic camps. Here I present data on the social composition of the parties in Congress indicating that they are increasingly differentiated by race, gender, and religion. Drawing on comparative work on democracy-building in divided societies, I argue that the deeper social divide between the parties makes American democracy more dependent upon political institutions that routinely impose power-sharing requirements on the major parties. Although polarization stresses the political system in numerous ways, American institutions still tend to block one party from running roughshod over the other. Such a political system risks immobilism and ineffectiveness, but it also promotes democratic stability.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Democratic Resilience |
| Subtitle of host publication | Can the United States Withstand Rising Polarization? |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Pages | 95-117 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108999601 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781108834100 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
- General Arts and Humanities
Keywords
- Constitutional design
- Democracy
- Political parties
- US Congress
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Crosscutting Cleavages, Political Institutions, and Democratic Resilience in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver