Cross-sectional and aggregate labor supply

Yongsung Chang, Sun Bin Kim, Kyooho Kwon, Richard Rogerson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


Standard heterogeneous agent macro models that highlight idiosyncratic productivity shocks do not generate the near zero cross-sectional correlation between hours and wages found in the data. We ask whether matching this moment matters for business cycle properties of these models. To do this we explore two extensions of the model in Chang et al. (2019) that can match this empirical cross-section correlation. One of these departs from the assumption of balanced growth preferences. The other introduces an idiosyncratic shock to the opportunity cost of market work that is highly correlated with the shock to market productivity. While both extensions can match the empirical correlation, they have large and opposing effects on the cyclical volatility of the labor market. We conclude that the cross-sectional moment is important for business cycle analysis and that more work is needed to distinguish the potential mechanisms that can generate it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103457
JournalEuropean Economic Review
StatePublished - Jul 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


  • Business cycles
  • Comparative advantage
  • Cross-section
  • Employment
  • Hours


Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-sectional and aggregate labor supply'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this