Corrigendum to: This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x)

Amy J.C. Cuddy; Michael I. Norton; Susan T. Fiske

doi:10.1111/josi.12185

Corrigendum to: This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x)

Amy J.C. Cuddy
, Michael I. Norton
, Susan T. Fiske

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The content of this article has been changed on September 6, 2016 after the first publication on May 16, 2005. The Results on p. 275 should read (changes in bold): “A one-way ANOVA revealed the predicted main effect on this score, F(2,52) = 3.93, p <.03, such that participants rated the high-incompetence elderly person as warmer (M = 7.47, SD = .73) than the low-incompetence (M = 6.85, SD = 1.28) and control (M = 6.59, SD = .87) elderly targets. Paired comparisons supported these findings, that the high-incompetence elderly person was rated as warmer than both the low-incompetence elderly target (marginally) and control elderly target (significantly), t(35) = 1.79, p = .08, and t(34) = 3.29, p<.01, respectively.” This correction does not change the conclusions of the article.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	614
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Social Issues
Volume	72
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12185
State	Published - Sep 1 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

General Social Sciences

Access to Document

10.1111/josi.12185

Cite this

@article{d48a129dab99452385858b5f620952d2,

title = "Corrigendum to: This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x)",

abstract = "The content of this article has been changed on September 6, 2016 after the first publication on May 16, 2005. The Results on p. 275 should read (changes in bold): “A one-way ANOVA revealed the predicted main effect on this score, F(2,52) = 3.93, p <.03, such that participants rated the high-incompetence elderly person as warmer (M = 7.47, SD = .73) than the low-incompetence (M = 6.85, SD = 1.28) and control (M = 6.59, SD = .87) elderly targets. Paired comparisons supported these findings, that the high-incompetence elderly person was rated as warmer than both the low-incompetence elderly target (marginally) and control elderly target (significantly), t(35) = 1.79, p = .08, and t(34) = 3.29, p<.01, respectively.” This correction does not change the conclusions of the article.",

author = "Cuddy, \{Amy J.C.\} and Norton, \{Michael I.\} and Fiske, \{Susan T.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/josi.12185",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "72",

pages = "614",

journal = "Journal of Social Issues",

issn = "0022-4537",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to

T2 - This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x)

AU - Cuddy, Amy J.C.

AU - Norton, Michael I.

AU - Fiske, Susan T.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - The content of this article has been changed on September 6, 2016 after the first publication on May 16, 2005. The Results on p. 275 should read (changes in bold): “A one-way ANOVA revealed the predicted main effect on this score, F(2,52) = 3.93, p <.03, such that participants rated the high-incompetence elderly person as warmer (M = 7.47, SD = .73) than the low-incompetence (M = 6.85, SD = 1.28) and control (M = 6.59, SD = .87) elderly targets. Paired comparisons supported these findings, that the high-incompetence elderly person was rated as warmer than both the low-incompetence elderly target (marginally) and control elderly target (significantly), t(35) = 1.79, p = .08, and t(34) = 3.29, p<.01, respectively.” This correction does not change the conclusions of the article.

AB - The content of this article has been changed on September 6, 2016 after the first publication on May 16, 2005. The Results on p. 275 should read (changes in bold): “A one-way ANOVA revealed the predicted main effect on this score, F(2,52) = 3.93, p <.03, such that participants rated the high-incompetence elderly person as warmer (M = 7.47, SD = .73) than the low-incompetence (M = 6.85, SD = 1.28) and control (M = 6.59, SD = .87) elderly targets. Paired comparisons supported these findings, that the high-incompetence elderly person was rated as warmer than both the low-incompetence elderly target (marginally) and control elderly target (significantly), t(35) = 1.79, p = .08, and t(34) = 3.29, p<.01, respectively.” This correction does not change the conclusions of the article.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84985961724

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84985961724#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1111/josi.12185

DO - 10.1111/josi.12185

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84985961724

SN - 0022-4537

VL - 72

SP - 614

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

IS - 3

ER -

Corrigendum to: This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype (10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.x)

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this