Abstract
When compared to Latin America, Asian economies since 1980 have grown faster and have done so with relatively modest inequalities. Why? A comparison of Asia and Latin America underlines the superiority of the nationalist capitalist model of development, which has often been pursued more explicitly in Asia, over that of a dependent capitalist model, which has often been pursued in Latin America. In comparison to Latin America, the Asian model has facilitated higher and less volatile rates of economic growth and a greater political room to pursue social democratic policies. The "tap root" of these alternate pathways is relative autonomy from global constraints: states and economies in Asia have been more nationalist and autonomous than in Latin America.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 531-556 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Brazilian Journal of Political Economy |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2012 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Political Science and International Relations
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Capitalist development
- Economic performance
- Washington consensus