Cooperation ≠ Consent: How Women React to their Place, based on Social Relations and Ambivalent Sexism

Mina Cikara, Susan T. Fiske

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the tension between interdependence and dominance. First, we briefly review prominent social psychological theories regarding the development and maintenance of status systems. Next we briefly describe how these structures help distribute social power in modern society. We then examine how prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination stem from status systems and interdependence, using the Stereotype Content Model (Fiske, Xu, Cuddy & Glick, 1999; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002). Next, we consider the unique circumstances of gender relations and how they give way to complementary justifications of gender inequality, using Ambivalent Sexism Theory (Glick & Fiske, 1996, 1999, 2001a, 2001b). Last, we review evidence to support our argument that women do not necessarily acquiesce joyfully to the present hierarchical arrangement, but rather guide their choices by their pragmatic alternatives, as dictated by benevolent and hostile ideologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSocial Psychology of Gender
EditorsShelley Correll
Pages99-122
Number of pages24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 13 2007

Publication series

NameAdvances in Group Processes
Volume24
ISSN (Print)0882-6145

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cooperation ≠ Consent: How Women React to their Place, based on Social Relations and Ambivalent Sexism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). Cooperation ≠ Consent: How Women React to their Place, based on Social Relations and Ambivalent Sexism. In S. Correll (Ed.), Social Psychology of Gender (pp. 99-122). (Advances in Group Processes; Vol. 24). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(07)24005-6