Contrasting local versus regional effects of land-use-change-induced heterogeneity on historical climate: Analysis with the GFDL earth system model

Sergey Malyshev, Elena Shevliakova, Ronald J. Stouffer, Stephen Wilson Pacala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) on surface climate using two ensembles of numerical experiments with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2Mb are investigated in this study. The experiments simulate historical climate with two different assumptions about LULCC: 1) no land-use change with potential vegetation (PV) and 2) with the CMIP5 historical reconstruction of LULCC (LU). Two different approaches were used in the analysis: 1) the authors compare differences in LU and PV climates to evaluate the regional and global effects of LULCC and 2) the authors characterize subgrid climate differences among different land-use tiles within each grid cell in the LU experiment. Using the first method, the authors estimate the magnitude of LULCC effect to be similar to some previous studies. Using the second method, the authors found a pronounced subgrid signal of LULCCin near-surface temperature over majority of areas affected by LULCC. The signal is strongest on croplands, where it is detectable with 95% confidence over 68.5% of all nonglaciated land grid cells in June-July-August, compared to 8.3% in the first method. In agricultural areas, the subgrid signal tends to be stronger than LU-PV signal by a factor of 1.3 in tropics in both summer and winter and by 1.5 in extratropics in winter. This analysis for the first time demonstrates and quantifies the local, subgrid-scale LULCC effects with a comprehensive ESM and compares it to previous global and regional approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5448-5469
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume28
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

fluid dynamics
land use change
land cover
land use
climate
vegetation
effect
laboratory
analysis
experiment
winter
surface temperature
agricultural land
summer
method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{41fcdb50d58b4c35b937da3834d48ddc,
title = "Contrasting local versus regional effects of land-use-change-induced heterogeneity on historical climate: Analysis with the GFDL earth system model",
abstract = "The effects of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) on surface climate using two ensembles of numerical experiments with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2Mb are investigated in this study. The experiments simulate historical climate with two different assumptions about LULCC: 1) no land-use change with potential vegetation (PV) and 2) with the CMIP5 historical reconstruction of LULCC (LU). Two different approaches were used in the analysis: 1) the authors compare differences in LU and PV climates to evaluate the regional and global effects of LULCC and 2) the authors characterize subgrid climate differences among different land-use tiles within each grid cell in the LU experiment. Using the first method, the authors estimate the magnitude of LULCC effect to be similar to some previous studies. Using the second method, the authors found a pronounced subgrid signal of LULCCin near-surface temperature over majority of areas affected by LULCC. The signal is strongest on croplands, where it is detectable with 95{\%} confidence over 68.5{\%} of all nonglaciated land grid cells in June-July-August, compared to 8.3{\%} in the first method. In agricultural areas, the subgrid signal tends to be stronger than LU-PV signal by a factor of 1.3 in tropics in both summer and winter and by 1.5 in extratropics in winter. This analysis for the first time demonstrates and quantifies the local, subgrid-scale LULCC effects with a comprehensive ESM and compares it to previous global and regional approaches.",
author = "Sergey Malyshev and Elena Shevliakova and Stouffer, {Ronald J.} and Pacala, {Stephen Wilson}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00586.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "5448--5469",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "13",

}

Contrasting local versus regional effects of land-use-change-induced heterogeneity on historical climate : Analysis with the GFDL earth system model. / Malyshev, Sergey; Shevliakova, Elena; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Pacala, Stephen Wilson.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, No. 13, 01.01.2015, p. 5448-5469.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting local versus regional effects of land-use-change-induced heterogeneity on historical climate

T2 - Analysis with the GFDL earth system model

AU - Malyshev, Sergey

AU - Shevliakova, Elena

AU - Stouffer, Ronald J.

AU - Pacala, Stephen Wilson

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The effects of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) on surface climate using two ensembles of numerical experiments with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2Mb are investigated in this study. The experiments simulate historical climate with two different assumptions about LULCC: 1) no land-use change with potential vegetation (PV) and 2) with the CMIP5 historical reconstruction of LULCC (LU). Two different approaches were used in the analysis: 1) the authors compare differences in LU and PV climates to evaluate the regional and global effects of LULCC and 2) the authors characterize subgrid climate differences among different land-use tiles within each grid cell in the LU experiment. Using the first method, the authors estimate the magnitude of LULCC effect to be similar to some previous studies. Using the second method, the authors found a pronounced subgrid signal of LULCCin near-surface temperature over majority of areas affected by LULCC. The signal is strongest on croplands, where it is detectable with 95% confidence over 68.5% of all nonglaciated land grid cells in June-July-August, compared to 8.3% in the first method. In agricultural areas, the subgrid signal tends to be stronger than LU-PV signal by a factor of 1.3 in tropics in both summer and winter and by 1.5 in extratropics in winter. This analysis for the first time demonstrates and quantifies the local, subgrid-scale LULCC effects with a comprehensive ESM and compares it to previous global and regional approaches.

AB - The effects of land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) on surface climate using two ensembles of numerical experiments with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) comprehensive Earth System Model ESM2Mb are investigated in this study. The experiments simulate historical climate with two different assumptions about LULCC: 1) no land-use change with potential vegetation (PV) and 2) with the CMIP5 historical reconstruction of LULCC (LU). Two different approaches were used in the analysis: 1) the authors compare differences in LU and PV climates to evaluate the regional and global effects of LULCC and 2) the authors characterize subgrid climate differences among different land-use tiles within each grid cell in the LU experiment. Using the first method, the authors estimate the magnitude of LULCC effect to be similar to some previous studies. Using the second method, the authors found a pronounced subgrid signal of LULCCin near-surface temperature over majority of areas affected by LULCC. The signal is strongest on croplands, where it is detectable with 95% confidence over 68.5% of all nonglaciated land grid cells in June-July-August, compared to 8.3% in the first method. In agricultural areas, the subgrid signal tends to be stronger than LU-PV signal by a factor of 1.3 in tropics in both summer and winter and by 1.5 in extratropics in winter. This analysis for the first time demonstrates and quantifies the local, subgrid-scale LULCC effects with a comprehensive ESM and compares it to previous global and regional approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942048307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942048307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00586.1

DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00586.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942048307

VL - 28

SP - 5448

EP - 5469

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 13

ER -