TY - JOUR
T1 - Considerations for governing open foundation models
AU - Bommasani, Rishi
AU - Kapoor, Sayash
AU - Klyman, Kevin
AU - Longpre, Shayne
AU - Ramaswami, Ashwin
AU - Zhang, Daniel
AU - Schaake, Marietje
AU - Ho, Daniel E.
AU - Narayanan, Arvind
AU - Liang, Percy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/10/11
Y1 - 2024/10/11
N2 - Foundation models (e.g., GPT-4 and Llama 3.1) are at the epicenter of artificial intelligence (AI), driving technological innovation and billions of dollars in investment. This has sparked widespread demands for regulation. Central to the debate about how to regulate foundation models is the process by which foundation models are released (1)—whether they are made available only to the model developers, fully open to the public, or somewhere in between. Open foundation models can benefit society by promoting competition, accelerating innovation, and distributing power. However, an emerging concern is whether open foundation models pose distinct risks to society (2). In general, although most policy proposals and regulations do not mention open foundation models by name, they may have an uneven impact on open and closed foundation models. We illustrate tensions that surface—and that policy-makers should consider—regarding different policy proposals that may disproportionately damage the innovation ecosystem around open foundation models.
AB - Foundation models (e.g., GPT-4 and Llama 3.1) are at the epicenter of artificial intelligence (AI), driving technological innovation and billions of dollars in investment. This has sparked widespread demands for regulation. Central to the debate about how to regulate foundation models is the process by which foundation models are released (1)—whether they are made available only to the model developers, fully open to the public, or somewhere in between. Open foundation models can benefit society by promoting competition, accelerating innovation, and distributing power. However, an emerging concern is whether open foundation models pose distinct risks to society (2). In general, although most policy proposals and regulations do not mention open foundation models by name, they may have an uneven impact on open and closed foundation models. We illustrate tensions that surface—and that policy-makers should consider—regarding different policy proposals that may disproportionately damage the innovation ecosystem around open foundation models.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206055500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85206055500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1126/science.adp1848
DO - 10.1126/science.adp1848
M3 - Article
C2 - 39388576
AN - SCOPUS:85206055500
SN - 0036-8075
VL - 386
SP - 151
EP - 153
JO - Science
JF - Science
IS - 6718
ER -