Comparison of options for a pilot plant fusion nuclear mission

T. Brown, A. E. Costley, Robert James Goldston, L. El-Guebaly, C. Kessel, G. H. Neilson, S. Malang, J. E. Menard, Stewart C. Prager, L. Waganer, P. Titus, M. Zarnstorff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A fusion pilot plant study was initiated to clarify the development needs in moving from ITER to a first of a kind fusion power plant, following a path similar to the approach adopted for the commercialization of fission. The pilot plant mission encompassed component test and fusion nuclear science missions plus the requirement to produce net electricity with high availability in a device designed to be prototypical of the commercial device. Three magnetic configuration options were developed around this mission: the advanced tokamak (AT), spherical tokamak (ST) and compact stellarator (CS). With the completion of the study and separate documentation of each design option a question can now be posed; how do the different designs compare with each other as candidates for meeting the pilot plant mission? In a pro/con format this paper will examine the key arguments for and against the AT, ST and CS magnetic configurations. Key topics addressed include: plasma parameters, device configurations, size and weight comparisons, diagnostic issues, maintenance schemes, availability influences and possible test cell arrangement schemes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)662-669
Number of pages8
JournalFusion Science and Technology
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of options for a pilot plant fusion nuclear mission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this