Comparison of Neighborhood-Scale, Residential Property Flood-Loss Assessment Methodologies

Rubayet Bin Mostafiz, Carol J. Friedland, Md Asif Rahman, Robert V. Rohli, Eric Tate, Nazla Bushra, Arash Taghinezhad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Leading flood loss estimation models include Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA’s) Hazus, FEMA’s Flood Assessment Structure Tool (FAST), and (U.S.) Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Flood Impact Analysis (HEC-FIA), with each requiring different data input. No research to date has compared the resulting outcomes from such models at a neighborhood scale. This research examines the building and content loss estimates by Hazus Level 2, FAST, and HEC-FIA, over a levee-protected census block in Metairie, in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Building attribute data in National Structure Inventory (NSI) 2.0 are compared against “best available data” (BAD) collected at the individual building scale from Google Street View, Jefferson Parish building inventory, and 2019 National Building Cost Manual, to assess the sensitivity of input building inventory selection. Results suggest that use of BAD likely enhances flood loss estimation accuracy over existing reliance on default data in the software or from a national data set that generalizes over a broad scale. Although the three models give similar mean (median) building and content loss, Hazus Level 2 results diverge from those produced by FAST and HEC-FIA at the individual building level. A statistically significant difference in mean (median) building loss exists, but no significant difference is found in mean (median) content loss, between building inventory input (i.e., NSI 2.0 vs BAD), but both the building and content loss vary at the individual building scale due to difference in building-inventory-reported foundation height, foundation type, number of stories, replacement cost, and content cost. Moreover, building loss estimation also differs significantly by depth-damage function (DDF), for flood depths corresponding with the longest return periods, with content loss differing significantly by DDF at all return periods tested, from 10 to 500 years. Knowledge of the extent of estimated differences aids in understanding the degree of uncertainty in flood loss estimation. Much like the real estate industry uses comparable home values to appraise a home, flood loss planners should use multiple models to estimate flood-related losses. Moreover, results from this study can be used as a baseline for assessing losses from other hazards, thereby enhancing protection of human life and property.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number734294
JournalFrontiers in Environmental Science
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2021
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Environmental Science

Keywords

  • building content loss assessment
  • building loss assessment
  • flood assessment structure tool
  • flood depth-damage function
  • flood modeling
  • hazus
  • HEC-FIA
  • national structure inventory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Neighborhood-Scale, Residential Property Flood-Loss Assessment Methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this