Abstract
We calculate the excitation energies of finite 1D Hubbard chains with a variety of different site energies from two perspectives: (i) the physics-based Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) method and (ii) the chemistry-based configuration interaction (CI) approach. Results obtained from all methods are compared against the exact values for three classes of systems: metallic, impurity-doped, and molecular (semiconducting/insulating) systems. While in a previous study we showed that the GW method holds comparative advantages versus traditional quantum chemistry approaches for calculating the ionization potentials and electron affinities across a large range of Hamiltonians, we show now that the BSE method outperforms CI approaches only for metallic and semiconducting systems. For insulating molecular systems, CI approaches generate better results.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 527-542 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 13 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Computer Science Applications
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison between the Bethe-Salpeter Equation and Configuration Interaction Approaches for Solving a Quantum Chemistry Problem: Calculating the Excitation Energy for Finite 1D Hubbard Chains'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver