TY - GEN
T1 - Communication Separations for Truthful Auctions
T2 - 65th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2024
AU - Ron, Shiri
AU - Thomas, Clayton
AU - Weinberg, S. Matthew
AU - Zhang, Qianfan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - We study the communication complexity of truthful combinatorial auctions, and in particular the case where valuations are either subadditive or single-minded, which we denote with SubAddUSingleM. We show that for three bidders with valuations in SubAddUSingleM, any deterministic truthful mechanism that achieves at least a 0.366-approximation requires exp(m) communication. In contrast, a natural extension of [Fei09] yields a non-truthful poly}(m)-communication} protocol that achieves a 1/2-approximation}, demonstrating a gap between the power of truthful mechanisms and non-truthful protocols for this problem. Our approach follows the taxation complexity framework laid out in [Dob16b], but applies this framework in a setting not encompassed by the techniques used in past work. In particular, the only successful prior application of this framework uses a reduction to simultaneous protocols which only applies for two bidders [AKSW20], whereas our three-player lower bounds are stronger than what can possibly arise from a two-player construction (since a trivial truthful auction guarantees a 1/2- approximation} for two players).
AB - We study the communication complexity of truthful combinatorial auctions, and in particular the case where valuations are either subadditive or single-minded, which we denote with SubAddUSingleM. We show that for three bidders with valuations in SubAddUSingleM, any deterministic truthful mechanism that achieves at least a 0.366-approximation requires exp(m) communication. In contrast, a natural extension of [Fei09] yields a non-truthful poly}(m)-communication} protocol that achieves a 1/2-approximation}, demonstrating a gap between the power of truthful mechanisms and non-truthful protocols for this problem. Our approach follows the taxation complexity framework laid out in [Dob16b], but applies this framework in a setting not encompassed by the techniques used in past work. In particular, the only successful prior application of this framework uses a reduction to simultaneous protocols which only applies for two bidders [AKSW20], whereas our three-player lower bounds are stronger than what can possibly arise from a two-player construction (since a trivial truthful auction guarantees a 1/2- approximation} for two players).
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85213034908
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85213034908#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/FOCS61266.2024.00032
DO - 10.1109/FOCS61266.2024.00032
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85213034908
T3 - Proceedings - Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS
SP - 386
EP - 405
BT - Proceedings - 2024 IEEE 65th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2024
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 27 October 2024 through 30 October 2024
ER -