TY - JOUR
T1 - Communication
T2 - Adjusting charge transfer state energies for configuration interaction singles: Without any parameterization and with minimal cost
AU - Liu, Xinle
AU - Fatehi, Shervin
AU - Shao, Yihan
AU - Veldkamp, Brad S.
AU - Subotnik, Joseph E.
PY - 2012/4/28
Y1 - 2012/4/28
N2 - In a recent article, we showed that configuration interaction singles (CIS) has a systematic bias against charge-transfer (CT) states: CT vertical excitation energies are consistently too high (by 1-2 eV) as compared with non-CT energies [J. E. Subotnik, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 071104 (2011)]. We now show that this CIS error can be corrected approximately by performing a single Newton-Raphson step to reoptimize orbitals, thus establishing a new set of orbitals which better balances ground and excited state energies. The computational cost of this correction is exactly that of one coupled-perturbed Hartree-Fock calculation, which is effectively the cost of the CIS calculation itself. In other words, for twice the computational cost of a standard CIS calculation, or roughly the same cost as a linear-response time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculation, one can achieve a balanced, size-consistent description of CT versus non-CT energies, ideally with the accuracy of a much more expensive doubles CIS(D) calculation.
AB - In a recent article, we showed that configuration interaction singles (CIS) has a systematic bias against charge-transfer (CT) states: CT vertical excitation energies are consistently too high (by 1-2 eV) as compared with non-CT energies [J. E. Subotnik, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 071104 (2011)]. We now show that this CIS error can be corrected approximately by performing a single Newton-Raphson step to reoptimize orbitals, thus establishing a new set of orbitals which better balances ground and excited state energies. The computational cost of this correction is exactly that of one coupled-perturbed Hartree-Fock calculation, which is effectively the cost of the CIS calculation itself. In other words, for twice the computational cost of a standard CIS calculation, or roughly the same cost as a linear-response time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculation, one can achieve a balanced, size-consistent description of CT versus non-CT energies, ideally with the accuracy of a much more expensive doubles CIS(D) calculation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860461372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860461372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.4705757
DO - 10.1063/1.4705757
M3 - Article
C2 - 22559462
AN - SCOPUS:84860461372
SN - 0021-9606
VL - 136
JO - Journal of Chemical Physics
JF - Journal of Chemical Physics
IS - 16
M1 - 161101
ER -