Abstract
Two studies examined the cognitive costs of blatant and subtle racial bias during interracial interactions. In Study 1, Black participants engaged in a 10-minute, face-to-face interaction with a White confederate who expressed attitudes and behaviors consistent with blatant, subtle, or no racial bias. Consistent with contemporary theories of modern racism, interacting with a subtly biased, compared with a blatantly biased, White partner impaired the cognitive functioning of Blacks. Study 2 revealed that Latino participants suffered similar cognitive impairments when exposed to a White partner who displayed subtle, compared with blatant, racial bias. The theoretical and practical implications for understanding the dynamics of interracial interactions in the context of contemporary bias are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 560-571 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Group Processes and Intergroup Relations |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Communication
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- attributional ambiguity
- cognitive depletion
- executive function
- interracial interactions
- prejudice
- racial and ethnic relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive costs of contemporary prejudice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver