Abstract
People from one cultural background often find themselves wondering how those from a different cultural background could willingly live the way they do and/or criticize others for living in the way they do. How are we to explain this kind of mutual incomprehension? Three different possible explanations will be considered. The first is that such mutual incomprehension is sourced in a moral flaw. The flaw might be in one of the cultures, as certain cultures might be premised on a moral mistake. Alternatively, the flaw might be a feature of the incomprehending individuals. If only they tried harder, they would come to appreciate the other's point of view. The second possibility is that such mutual incomprehension is the product of principled limits on the interpretation of someone from another culture. Contrary to the first possibility, there might be no way for people from different cultures to even understand each other, let alone find fault in each other, because the culturally mediated ways in which they understand the world are inaccessible to each other. The third possibility is that the mutual incomprehension is sourced in metaphysics. Contrary to the second possibility, there might be some non-metaphorical sense in which people from different cultures inhabit different worlds. The main task of the chapter is to describe and evaluate these three possibilities with a view to ruling out the third.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Human Minds and Cultures |
Publisher | Springer Nature |
Pages | 73-88 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031564482 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783031564475 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 29 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Arts and Humanities
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- Carole Rovane
- Constitutivism
- Critical ethics
- Disagreement
- Ethical relativism
- Ethics of agency
- Positive ethics