Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

320 Scopus citations

Abstract

A previously unobserved pattern of choice behavior is predicted and corroborated. In line with the principle of compatibility, according to which the weighting of inputs is enhanced by their compatibility with output, the positive and negative dimensions of options (their pros and cons) are expected to loom larger when one is choosing and when one is rejecting, respectively. Subjects are presented with pairs of options, one of which-the enriched option-has more positive as well as more negative dimensions than does the other, impoverished, option. Because positive dimensions are weighted more heavily in choosing than in rejecting, and negative dimensions are weighted more heavily in rejecting than in choosing, the enriched option tends to be chosen and rejected relatively more often than the impoverished option. These findings are extended to nonbinary decision problems, and their implications for the rational theory of choice and for everyday decisions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-556
Number of pages11
JournalMemory & Cognition
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1993

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this