Abstract
This is Volume 1 of the report of a panel established by the U.S. Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (FESAC) and submitted in July 2005. The panel was charged to answer the following questions: What are the unique and complementary characteristics of each of the major U.S. fusion facilities? How do the characteristics of each of the three U.S. fusion facilities make the U.S. toroidal research program unique as a whole in the international program? How well do we cooperate with the international community in coordinating research on our major facilities and how have we exploited the special features of U.S. facilities in contributing to international fusion research, in general, and to the ITER design specifically? How do these three facilities contribute to fusion science and the vitality of the U.S. Fusion program? What research opportunities would be lost by shutting down one of the major facilities?
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-171 |
| Number of pages | 47 |
| Journal | Journal of Fusion Energy |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Keywords
- Fusion energy
- Fusion facilities
- Fusion science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics and contributions of the three major united states toroidal magnetic fusion facilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver