Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Changing Patterns of Ideology and Partisanship in Latin America

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter compares the temporal evolution of the alignment between ideological platforms and the social bases of partisan support in ten Latin American countries (the eight political party systems from Collier and Collier [1991], plus Bolivia and Ecuador). The chapter shows that whereas the correlation between a party’s ideology and its partisan support among marginalized voters (the poor and informal sector workers) was very weak during the neoliberal consensus of the 1990s, in recent years leftist parties have been more successful in attracting this electorate. At the same time, however, leftist parties’ support from its traditional base (the formal working class and public sector employees) weakened during this time period. Moreover, the extent of this realignment was much stronger in some countries (Brazil, Peru and to some extent Argentina and Venezuela) than in others. The final section of the chapter identifies and evaluates alternative explanations for these cross-national trajectory differences and finds that extensive realignment was more likely to occur in countries where leftist incumbents relied at least moderately on patronage in their electoral strategies. This finding questions the durability of the realignment once leftist parties are out of power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Inclusionary Turn in Latin American Democracies
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages185-218
Number of pages34
ISBN (Electronic)9781108895835
ISBN (Print)9781108842044
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • ideology
  • linkages
  • partisanship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changing Patterns of Ideology and Partisanship in Latin America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this