TY - JOUR
T1 - Can Switching from Coal to Shale Gas Bring Net Carbon Reductions to China?
AU - Qin, Yue
AU - Edwards, Ryan
AU - Tong, Fan
AU - Mauzerall, Denise Leonore
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/3/7
Y1 - 2017/3/7
N2 - To increase energy security and reduce emissions of air pollutants and CO2 from coal use, China is attempting to duplicate the rapid development of shale gas that has taken place in the United States. This work builds a framework to estimate the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from China's shale gas system and compares them with GHG emissions from coal used in the power, residential, and industrial sectors. We find the mean lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas is about 30-50% lower than that of coal in all sectors under both 20 year and 100 year global warming potentials (GWP20 and GWP100). However, primarily due to large uncertainties in methane leakage, the upper bound estimate of the lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas in China could be approximately 15-60% higher than that of coal across sectors under GWP20. To ensure net GHG emission reductions when switching from coal to shale gas, we estimate the breakeven methane leakage rates to be approximately 6.0%, 7.7%, and 4.2% in the power, residential, and industrial sectors, respectively, under GWP20. We find shale gas in China has a good chance of delivering air quality and climate cobenefits, particularly when used in the residential sector, with proper methane leakage control.
AB - To increase energy security and reduce emissions of air pollutants and CO2 from coal use, China is attempting to duplicate the rapid development of shale gas that has taken place in the United States. This work builds a framework to estimate the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from China's shale gas system and compares them with GHG emissions from coal used in the power, residential, and industrial sectors. We find the mean lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas is about 30-50% lower than that of coal in all sectors under both 20 year and 100 year global warming potentials (GWP20 and GWP100). However, primarily due to large uncertainties in methane leakage, the upper bound estimate of the lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas in China could be approximately 15-60% higher than that of coal across sectors under GWP20. To ensure net GHG emission reductions when switching from coal to shale gas, we estimate the breakeven methane leakage rates to be approximately 6.0%, 7.7%, and 4.2% in the power, residential, and industrial sectors, respectively, under GWP20. We find shale gas in China has a good chance of delivering air quality and climate cobenefits, particularly when used in the residential sector, with proper methane leakage control.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019121916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019121916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.6b04072
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.6b04072
M3 - Article
C2 - 28178420
AN - SCOPUS:85019121916
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 51
SP - 2554
EP - 2562
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 5
ER -