Beyond action

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Isaac Reed, like the great early work of Talcott Parsons, is focused on social action and continental theorization and largely blind to the broader American interactionist tradition. Absent are Blumer, Dewey, Mead, James (though Peirce appears fleetingly), or the more phenomenological tradition of Schutz or Garfinkel. Absent too is the relational theorizing of gender and race scholars. Given all that is in Reed, it is absurd to suggest that there isn’t enough. The point of this paper is different. It is simply that there are alternate important traditions that ethnographic work draws upon that might aid in pushing Reed’s arguments in different directions. I hope to show how an interactionalist perspective proves fruitful in moving us beyond some of the basic challenges of the classical tradition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)88-96
Number of pages9
JournalEthnography
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Keywords

  • ethnography
  • interactionism
  • interpretivist
  • social action
  • theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this