Abstract
Educators may be unhappy with the current NCLB-style accountability model. But they should exercise equal caution when considering the growth model because a poorly designed growth model would be no better than the poorly designed proficiency model we have now. The tension between more accurate - and arguably more fair - assessments of school quality, and uniformly high standards for achievement, will not be resolved easily.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 635-639 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Phi Delta Kappan |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Beware of geeks bearing formulas": Reflections on growth models for school accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver