Being human and doing primatology: National, socioeconomic, and ethnic influences on primatological practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The emerging manifesto, center of the essay collection this commentary is part of, points out that primatology is a primate's science and field of endeavor. It is about primates, and constructed and carried out by primates. But the relationships between different primates involved in primatology cannot be described merely as scientific, zoological, or conservatory. A main point emerging from this perspective is that the relationships amongst primates (as scientists and as subjects) are affected by primatologists' experiences outside of academic science and within the cultural schema that we acquire as members of human societies. My contribution focuses on the primatologists and their sometimes discussed, but too often ignored, cultural and ethnic contexts as influences on how they study, think about, and interact with other primates. In our views and bonds with other primates, do national, class, and ethnic factors count?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-237
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Primatology
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Keywords

  • Bonds
  • Cultural schema
  • Ethnicity
  • Nationality
  • Primatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Being human and doing primatology: National, socioeconomic, and ethnic influences on primatological practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this