Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Before - and beyond - On Liberty: Samuel Bailey and the nineteenth-century theory of free speech

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In 1829 the Westminster Review, the official journal of Benthamite principles with which both Mills and many other radical luminaries were involved, declared a recent publication to be the 'second greatest of all comparatively modern books', after Smith's Wealth of Nations. Surprisingly, this accolade was directed at a work that has subsequently become unknown: Essays on the Formation and Publication of Opinions by Samuel Bailey. Though forgotten today, Bailey was a celebrated political economist, writer on parliamentary reform, mental philosopher and, above all, champion of toleration and a free press. The Formation and Publication was a vigorous defence of freedom of thought and discussion, and it had a lasting (if now unacknowledged) impact on the way this subject was handled throughout the nineteenth century. This chapter provides the first reconstruction and assessment of Bailey's theory of intellectual-expressive liberty. In particular, it homes in on four main elements of his thought: (1) his innovative account of social intolerance; (2) his notion of a duty to pursue and speak the truth; (3) his psychological principle of the involuntariness of belief; and (4) his conception of the marketplace of ideas. It also touches on the legacy of Bailey's theory of free thought and speech in the history of political thought.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationFreedom of speech, 1500-1850
PublisherManchester University Press
Pages211-235
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781526147110
ISBN (Print)9781526147103
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 27 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Before - and beyond - On Liberty: Samuel Bailey and the nineteenth-century theory of free speech'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this