TY - JOUR
T1 - Basin-scale modeling of CO2 storage using models of varying complexity
AU - Huang, Xinwo
AU - Bandilla, Karl W.
AU - Celia, Michael Anthony
AU - Bachu, Stefan
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement RD-83438501; the National Science Foundation under Grant EAR-0934722 ; the Department of Energy under Award No. DE-FE0009563; and the Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton University .
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Geological carbon storage can significantly contribute to climate-change mitigation only if it is deployed at a very large scale. This means that injection scenarios must occur, and be analyzed, at the basin scale. Various mathematical models of different complexity may be used to assess the fate of injected CO2 and/or resident brine. These models span the range from multi-dimensional, multi-phase numerical simulators to simple single-phase analytical solutions. In this study, we consider a range of models, all based on vertically integrated governing equations, to predict the basin-scale pressure response to specific injection scenarios. The Canadian section of the mid-continent Basal Aquifer is used as a test site to compare the different modeling approaches. The model domain covers an area of approximately 811,000km2, and the total injection rate is 63Mt/yr, corresponding to 9 locations where large point sources have been identified. Predicted areas of critical pressure exceedance are used as a comparison metric among the different modeling approaches. Comparison of the results shows that single-phase numerical models may be good enough to predict the pressure response over a large aquifer; however, a simple superposition of semi-analytical or analytical solutions is not sufficiently accurate because spatial variability of formation properties plays an important role in the problem, and these variations are not captured properly with simple superposition. We consider two different injection scenarios: injection at the source locations and injection at locations with more suitable aquifer properties. Results indicate that in formations with significant spatial variability of properties, strong variations in injectivity among the different source locations can be expected, leading to the need to transport the captured CO2 to suitable injection locations, thereby necessitating development of a pipeline network.
AB - Geological carbon storage can significantly contribute to climate-change mitigation only if it is deployed at a very large scale. This means that injection scenarios must occur, and be analyzed, at the basin scale. Various mathematical models of different complexity may be used to assess the fate of injected CO2 and/or resident brine. These models span the range from multi-dimensional, multi-phase numerical simulators to simple single-phase analytical solutions. In this study, we consider a range of models, all based on vertically integrated governing equations, to predict the basin-scale pressure response to specific injection scenarios. The Canadian section of the mid-continent Basal Aquifer is used as a test site to compare the different modeling approaches. The model domain covers an area of approximately 811,000km2, and the total injection rate is 63Mt/yr, corresponding to 9 locations where large point sources have been identified. Predicted areas of critical pressure exceedance are used as a comparison metric among the different modeling approaches. Comparison of the results shows that single-phase numerical models may be good enough to predict the pressure response over a large aquifer; however, a simple superposition of semi-analytical or analytical solutions is not sufficiently accurate because spatial variability of formation properties plays an important role in the problem, and these variations are not captured properly with simple superposition. We consider two different injection scenarios: injection at the source locations and injection at locations with more suitable aquifer properties. Results indicate that in formations with significant spatial variability of properties, strong variations in injectivity among the different source locations can be expected, leading to the need to transport the captured CO2 to suitable injection locations, thereby necessitating development of a pipeline network.
KW - Basal Aquifer
KW - Geological carbon sequestration
KW - Injection scenarios
KW - Large-scale pressure response
KW - Model complexity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888402561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888402561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84888402561
SN - 1750-5836
VL - 20
SP - 73
EP - 86
JO - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
JF - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
ER -