Abstract
Standardized quantitative emissions benchmarking is essential for corporate climate accountability, yet recent literature has critiqued this approach. We argue for structured pluralism with budget compliance — balancing methodological flexibility while preserving the disciplining power of carbon budgets.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1127-1129 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Nature Climate Change |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Nov 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver