Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking

  • Saphira Rekker
  • , Kaya Axelsson
  • , Anders Bjørn
  • , Chris Greig
  • , Richard Heede
  • , Matthew J. Hornsey
  • , Jacquelyn E. Humphrey
  • , Matthew Ives
  • , David Kampmann
  • , Mark Roelfsema
  • , Adrien Rose
  • , Sue Lyn Stubbs
  • , Belinda Wade

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Standardized quantitative emissions benchmarking is essential for corporate climate accountability, yet recent literature has critiqued this approach. We argue for structured pluralism with budget compliance — balancing methodological flexibility while preserving the disciplining power of carbon budgets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1127-1129
Number of pages3
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this