Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)

Lina Necib; Bryan Ostdiek; Mariangela Lisanti; Timothy Cohen; Marat Freytsis; Shea Garrison-Kimmel; Philip F. Hopkins; Andrew Wetzel; Robyn Sanderson

doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)

Lina Necib, Bryan Ostdiek, Mariangela Lisanti, Timothy Cohen, Marat Freytsis, Shea Garrison-Kimmel, Philip F. Hopkins, Andrew Wetzel, Robyn Sanderson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In the version of this Article originally published, the number of stars that can be attributed to Nyx with high confidence was given as 200; however, due to an error in the calculation of the probabilities of stars belonging to a particular kinematic structure, the number of stars is actually 90. As a result, edits have been made to the text of the paper and the relevant data in Figs. 1–3, and Supplementary Figs. 1–7 have been updated. The Supplementary Information PDF has also been updated.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	866-875
Number of pages	10
Journal	Nature Astronomy
Volume	6
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3
State	Published - Jul 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Access to Document

10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

Cite this

Necib, L., Ostdiek, B., Lisanti, M., Cohen, T., Freytsis, M., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Hopkins, P. F., Wetzel, A., & Sanderson, R. (2022). Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2). Nature Astronomy, 6(7), 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

@article{c10f8c6b0c53429082342effcd38c37b,

title = "Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)",

abstract = "In the version of this Article originally published, the number of stars that can be attributed to Nyx with high confidence was given as 200; however, due to an error in the calculation of the probabilities of stars belonging to a particular kinematic structure, the number of stars is actually 90. As a result, edits have been made to the text of the paper and the relevant data in Figs. 1–3, and Supplementary Figs. 1–7 have been updated. The Supplementary Information PDF has also been updated.",

author = "Lina Necib and Bryan Ostdiek and Mariangela Lisanti and Timothy Cohen and Marat Freytsis and Shea Garrison-Kimmel and Hopkins, {Philip F.} and Andrew Wetzel and Robyn Sanderson",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "6",

pages = "866--875",

journal = "Nature Astronomy",

issn = "2397-3366",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "7",

}

Necib, L, Ostdiek, B, Lisanti, M, Cohen, T, Freytsis, M, Garrison-Kimmel, S, Hopkins, PF, Wetzel, A & Sanderson, R 2022, 'Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)', Nature Astronomy, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author Correction

T2 - Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)

AU - Necib, Lina

AU - Ostdiek, Bryan

AU - Lisanti, Mariangela

AU - Cohen, Timothy

AU - Freytsis, Marat

AU - Garrison-Kimmel, Shea

AU - Hopkins, Philip F.

AU - Wetzel, Andrew

AU - Sanderson, Robyn

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - In the version of this Article originally published, the number of stars that can be attributed to Nyx with high confidence was given as 200; however, due to an error in the calculation of the probabilities of stars belonging to a particular kinematic structure, the number of stars is actually 90. As a result, edits have been made to the text of the paper and the relevant data in Figs. 1–3, and Supplementary Figs. 1–7 have been updated. The Supplementary Information PDF has also been updated.

AB - In the version of this Article originally published, the number of stars that can be attributed to Nyx with high confidence was given as 200; however, due to an error in the calculation of the probabilities of stars belonging to a particular kinematic structure, the number of stars is actually 90. As a result, edits have been made to the text of the paper and the relevant data in Figs. 1–3, and Supplementary Figs. 1–7 have been updated. The Supplementary Information PDF has also been updated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132068812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132068812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

DO - 10.1038/s41550-022-01690-3

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85132068812

SN - 2397-3366

VL - 6

SP - 866

EP - 875

JO - Nature Astronomy

JF - Nature Astronomy

IS - 7

ER -

Author Correction: Evidence for a vast prograde stellar stream in the solar vicinity (Nature Astronomy, (2020), 4, 11, (1078-1083), 10.1038/s41550-020-1131-2)

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this