Abstract
When testing between spotlight and activity distribution models of visual attention, D. LaBerge, R. L. Carlson, J. K. Williams, and B. G. Bunney (1997) used an experimental paradigm in which targets are embedded in 3 brief displays. This paradigm, however, may be confounded by retinal eccentricity effects and saccadic eye movements. When the retinal eccentricities of the targets are equated and eye position is monitored, the pattern of results reported by LaBerge et al., which supported the activity distribution model, is not found. This result underscores the importance of considering targets' eccentricity and people's inclination to make saccadic eye movements in certain types of visual cognition tasks.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1061-1066 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2005 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Keywords
- Attention
- Distribution
- Eccentricity
- Eye movements