Argument and agreement in Plato's Crito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is argued that the Crito hinges on the relation between words and deeds. Socrates sets out a standard of agreement reached through persuasive argument or words. In this case the argument is deliberative: a general shared principle (do not do wrong) is juxtaposed to a particular minor premise (this act of escape is wrong) to reach a conclusion (do not escape). Crito baulks at the perception of the minor premise. At this juncture the Laws of Athens are introduced, who set out a standard of agreement established instead by deeds. Both standards apply to Socrates, constituting the drama of the dialogue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)x-327
JournalHistory of Political Thought
Volume19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1998
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Argument and agreement in Plato's Crito'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this