Abstract
This essay critically assesses Christine Hobden’s argument in Citizenship in a Globalised World that democratic citizenship is an important vehicle for the attainment of global justice. The first section examines Hobden’s claim that cosmopolitan consequentialism justifies citizenship in separate states. I argue that for this argument to succeed, it needs to elaborate a connection between relational equality for individuals and the self-determination of political groups. The second section scrutinizes Hobden’s account of the collective culpability of a democratic citizenry for their state’s wrongful actions. I argue that it is difficult to make sense of collective culpability: we are better off focusing on the personal culpability of individuals for contributing to collective wrongs.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1176-1183 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Citizenship
- Collective Responsibility
- Self-Determination
- global justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Are citizens responsible for global wrongs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver