Are citizens responsible for global wrongs?

Anna Stilz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This essay critically assesses Christine Hobden’s argument in Citizenship in a Globalised World that democratic citizenship is an important vehicle for the attainment of global justice. The first section examines Hobden’s claim that cosmopolitan consequentialism justifies citizenship in separate states. I argue that for this argument to succeed, it needs to elaborate a connection between relational equality for individuals and the self-determination of political groups. The second section scrutinizes Hobden’s account of the collective culpability of a democratic citizenry for their state’s wrongful actions. I argue that it is difficult to make sense of collective culpability: we are better off focusing on the personal culpability of individuals for contributing to collective wrongs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1176-1183
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2023

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy
  • Sociology and Political Science


  • Citizenship
  • Collective Responsibility
  • Self-Determination
  • global justice


Dive into the research topics of 'Are citizens responsible for global wrongs?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this