Abstract
This essay critically assesses Christine Hobden’s argument in Citizenship in a Globalised World that democratic citizenship is an important vehicle for the attainment of global justice. The first section examines Hobden’s claim that cosmopolitan consequentialism justifies citizenship in separate states. I argue that for this argument to succeed, it needs to elaborate a connection between relational equality for individuals and the self-determination of political groups. The second section scrutinizes Hobden’s account of the collective culpability of a democratic citizenry for their state’s wrongful actions. I argue that it is difficult to make sense of collective culpability: we are better off focusing on the personal culpability of individuals for contributing to collective wrongs.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1176-1183 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2023 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Citizenship
- Collective Responsibility
- Self-Determination
- global justice