Are Black state legislators more responsive to emails associated with the NAACP versus BLM? A field experiment on Black intragroup politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We fielded an experiment on a sample of approximately 400 Black state legislators to test whether they would be more responsive to an email that mentioned the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) relative to an email that mentioned Black Lives Matter (BLM). The experiment tested Cohen's theory of secondary marginalization (1999), whereby relatively advantaged members of a marginalized group regulate the behavior, attitudes, and access to resources of less advantaged members of the group. We expected that Black legislators would be less responsive to an email that referenced BLM, an organization that is associated with more marginalized members of the Black community. Contrary to our hypothesis, Black legislators were as responsive to emails referencing inspiration from BLM as they were to emails referencing inspiration from the NAACP. Thus, we do not find any evidence of intragroup discrimination by Black state legislators. To our knowledge, this is the first field experiment to test Cohen's theory of secondary marginalization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-218
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 18 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Keywords

  • Black Lives Matter
  • Black politics
  • field experiments
  • respectability politics
  • secondary marginalization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Black state legislators more responsive to emails associated with the NAACP versus BLM? A field experiment on Black intragroup politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this