TY - JOUR
T1 - Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge
AU - Prior, Markus
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful to David Brady, who made it possible for me to design the survey that provides the data for this article. The writing of the article was supported in part by a Pew Summer Writing Fellowship from the Pew Internet & American Life Project. My thanks to Doug Arnold, Larry Bartels, Matt Baum, Michael Delli Carpini, and Jay Hamilton for many helpful comments.
PY - 2003/4
Y1 - 2003/4
N2 - Several scholars, most notably Matt Baum, have recently argued that soft news formats contribute to democratic discourse, because they attract viewers who would otherwise not be exposed to news at all. I extend Baum's approach in two ways. First, Baum's theory postulates that people's appreciation of entertainment is one of the factors determining news exposure and, by extension, attention to politics, but he does not analyze the underlying utility calculation directly. I create a measure of entertainment preference and examine its impact on people's preferred news formats. Second, while Baum's analysis is restricted to attention paid to politics, I assess the effect of soft news preference on political knowledge. If soft news leads people to pay more attention to the "entertaining" aspect of politics, but does not actually produce any learning effects, the suggested positive consequences of soft news would have to be qualified. The main data source for this article is a survey of 2,358 randomly selected U.S. residents conducted by Knowledge Networks in February and March 2002. Results show that people like soft news for its entertainment value but that soft news programs are still not very popular compared to hard news and pure entertainment. More critically, there is only very limited evidence that viewers actually learn from soft news. The positive consequences of soft news for the political process remain to be demonstrated.
AB - Several scholars, most notably Matt Baum, have recently argued that soft news formats contribute to democratic discourse, because they attract viewers who would otherwise not be exposed to news at all. I extend Baum's approach in two ways. First, Baum's theory postulates that people's appreciation of entertainment is one of the factors determining news exposure and, by extension, attention to politics, but he does not analyze the underlying utility calculation directly. I create a measure of entertainment preference and examine its impact on people's preferred news formats. Second, while Baum's analysis is restricted to attention paid to politics, I assess the effect of soft news preference on political knowledge. If soft news leads people to pay more attention to the "entertaining" aspect of politics, but does not actually produce any learning effects, the suggested positive consequences of soft news would have to be qualified. The main data source for this article is a survey of 2,358 randomly selected U.S. residents conducted by Knowledge Networks in February and March 2002. Results show that people like soft news for its entertainment value but that soft news programs are still not very popular compared to hard news and pure entertainment. More critically, there is only very limited evidence that viewers actually learn from soft news. The positive consequences of soft news for the political process remain to be demonstrated.
KW - Entertainment preference
KW - Hard news
KW - News preference
KW - Political knowledge
KW - Soft news
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038118694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038118694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10584600390211172
DO - 10.1080/10584600390211172
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0038118694
SN - 1058-4609
VL - 20
SP - 149
EP - 171
JO - Political Communication
JF - Political Communication
IS - 2
ER -