Antimicrobial resistance and the great divide: inequity in priorities and agendas between the Global North and the Global South threatens global mitigation of antimicrobial resistance

Marc Mendelson, Ramanan Laxminarayan, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Samuel Kariuki, Martha Gyansa-Lutterodt, Esmita Charani, Sanjeev Singh, Kamini Walia, Ana C. Gales, Mirfin Mpundu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

To limit the catastrophic effects of the increasing bacterial resistance to antimicrobials on health, food, environmental, and geopolitical security, and ensure that no country or region is left behind, a coordinated global approach is required. In this Viewpoint, we argue that the diverging resource availabilities, needs, and priorities of the Global North and the Global South in terms of the actions required to mitigate the antimicrobial resistance pandemic are a direct threat to success. We argue that evidence suggests a need to prioritise and support infection prevention interventions (ie, clean water and safe sanitation, increased vaccine coverage, and enhanced infection prevention measures for food production in the Global South contrary to the focus on research and development of new antibiotics in the Global North) and to recalibrate global funding resources to address this need. We call on global leaders to redress the current response, which threatens mitigation of the antimicrobial resistance pandemic.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e516-e521
JournalThe Lancet Global Health
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antimicrobial resistance and the great divide: inequity in priorities and agendas between the Global North and the Global South threatens global mitigation of antimicrobial resistance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this