TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthropology of proprioception
T2 - Endurance and collectivity on unstable grounds in postrevolutionary Cairo
AU - Elyachar, Julia
N1 - Funding Information:
For their comments on earlier versions of this article, I thank Gil Anidjar, Hollianna Bryant, Omnia El Shakry, Agustín Fuentes, Behrooz Ghamari-Tabrizi, Tomaž Mastnak, Joanne Randa Nucho, and AbdouMaliq Simone. For their multiple modes of contribution to this work, I thank Ammiel Alcalay, Elijan Mastnak, Tomaž Mastnak, Laila Moustafa, Ricky Rivera, Hanan Sabea, the late Milijana Vučićević-Salama, and, especially, Essam Fawzi. I benefitted immensely from incisive comments and criticism from anonymous reviewers for American Anthropologist and from Elizabeth Chin, Kristin Peterson, and Sean Mallin.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the American Anthropological Association.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - In this article, I turn from the anthropology of resistance to an anthropology of proprioception. I draw on the concept of proprioception—conscious awareness of the body in space—to provide conceptual language for rethinking collective agency in the long aftermath of mass revolt. I bring proprioception together with the concept of barzakh, or estuary, as interpreted by Ibn ‘Arabi (1165–1240) and Abou El Fetouh (2015), to consider different groundings of collective movement. I do so, for one thing, because of a lingering individualism of the body in formulations of resistance and because of the urgency of thinking collectivity together with ground in times of climate emergency. I draw from debates about collectivity and ground in Egypt, the Middle East, and the broader region of the former Ottoman Empire to make my arguments about why this matters for anthropology. I think this through with ethnographic material from Cairo over the span of 1996–2019, focusing less on conversation and interaction in a particular location than on interactions in movement, across and down the street, and among interlocutors in fields of anthropology, physiology, and social theory in nineteenth-century Great Britain, the United States, and Egypt.
AB - In this article, I turn from the anthropology of resistance to an anthropology of proprioception. I draw on the concept of proprioception—conscious awareness of the body in space—to provide conceptual language for rethinking collective agency in the long aftermath of mass revolt. I bring proprioception together with the concept of barzakh, or estuary, as interpreted by Ibn ‘Arabi (1165–1240) and Abou El Fetouh (2015), to consider different groundings of collective movement. I do so, for one thing, because of a lingering individualism of the body in formulations of resistance and because of the urgency of thinking collectivity together with ground in times of climate emergency. I draw from debates about collectivity and ground in Egypt, the Middle East, and the broader region of the former Ottoman Empire to make my arguments about why this matters for anthropology. I think this through with ethnographic material from Cairo over the span of 1996–2019, focusing less on conversation and interaction in a particular location than on interactions in movement, across and down the street, and among interlocutors in fields of anthropology, physiology, and social theory in nineteenth-century Great Britain, the United States, and Egypt.
KW - embodiment
KW - history of thought
KW - Middle East
KW - mobility
KW - revolt
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134919190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134919190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/aman.13760
DO - 10.1111/aman.13760
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134919190
SN - 1548-1433
VL - 124
SP - 525
EP - 535
JO - American Anthropologist
JF - American Anthropologist
IS - 3
ER -