Abstract
The Anthropocene’s rising appeal as a story form results in part from mounting frustration over climate inaction at successive climate summits, frustration over the well-funded culture of anti-science in the US, and frustration over government inertia across the globe. But the Anthropocene also offers a response to a widespread exhaustion with the imagery and rhetoric of apocalypse. As Eddie Yuen has remarked, the terrain of catastrophe is “a crowded field”; “Environmentalists and scientists must compete in this marketplace of catastrophe, and find themselves struggling to be heard above the din.” 1 In 2013, Elizabeth Kolbert noted in the New Yorker that CO2 levels in Earth’s atmosphere have surpassed 400 parts per million, a threshold last crossed 21/2 million years ago. Kolbert noted, too, that this extraordinary planetary event “started out as terrifying and may now be described as terrifyingly predictable.” 2 In an apocalypse-weary world, the crossing of that dangerous threshold mustered, at best, muffled media coverage and no discernable policy changes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Social Theories for the Anthropocene |
| Subtitle of host publication | Diversities Across the Divides |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 257-261 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781040428771 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781032577852 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- General Environmental Science
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anthropocene and Environmental Justice (From Curating the Future: Museums, Communities and Climate Change)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver