TY - JOUR
T1 - Anthelmintic resistance revisited
T2 - Under-dosing, chemoprophylactic strategies, and mating probabilities
AU - Smith, Gary
AU - Grenfell, Bryan T.
AU - Isham, Valerie
AU - Cornell, Stephen
N1 - Funding Information:
ful discussions with Dr Paul Wileyto and Dr Bryan Cherry. In the UK, B.T.G., V.I. and SC. gratefully acknowledge the financial support of BBSRC and EPSRC.
PY - 1999/1
Y1 - 1999/1
N2 - Deterministic and stochastic models are used to examine the evolution of anthelmintic resistance among trichostrongylid parasites of domestic ruminants. We find that the relative selection pressures exerted by chemoprophylactic (preventive) control strategies, chemotherapeutic (salvage) control strategies, and regimens involving under-dosing are critically dependent on a variety of host and parasite parameters (particularly host immunity and grazing behaviour, parasite fecundity, and the survival of the free-living stages on the pasture). Chemoprophylactic strategies are not necessarily more likely to exert a stronger selection pressure than chemotherapeutic strategies. Similarly, as one reduces dosage levels, there is a range of dose levels where under-dosing promotes resistance and a range of dose levels where under-dosing impedes resistance. The most dangerous dose is either that necessary to kill all the susceptible homozygotes, or that necessary to kill all the susceptible homozygotes and all the heterozygotes. Which one prevails depends upon model parameters. The stochastic formulation indicates that spatial heterogeneity in transmission may be a significant force in promoting the spread of resistant genotypes-at least when infection is at low levels. Copyright (C) 1998 Australian Society for Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
AB - Deterministic and stochastic models are used to examine the evolution of anthelmintic resistance among trichostrongylid parasites of domestic ruminants. We find that the relative selection pressures exerted by chemoprophylactic (preventive) control strategies, chemotherapeutic (salvage) control strategies, and regimens involving under-dosing are critically dependent on a variety of host and parasite parameters (particularly host immunity and grazing behaviour, parasite fecundity, and the survival of the free-living stages on the pasture). Chemoprophylactic strategies are not necessarily more likely to exert a stronger selection pressure than chemotherapeutic strategies. Similarly, as one reduces dosage levels, there is a range of dose levels where under-dosing promotes resistance and a range of dose levels where under-dosing impedes resistance. The most dangerous dose is either that necessary to kill all the susceptible homozygotes, or that necessary to kill all the susceptible homozygotes and all the heterozygotes. Which one prevails depends upon model parameters. The stochastic formulation indicates that spatial heterogeneity in transmission may be a significant force in promoting the spread of resistant genotypes-at least when infection is at low levels. Copyright (C) 1998 Australian Society for Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
KW - Anthelmintic resistance
KW - Mathematical model
KW - Parasite distributions
KW - Spatial heterogeneity in transmission
KW - Stochastic model
KW - Under-dosing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032894249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032894249&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00186-6
DO - 10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00186-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 10048821
AN - SCOPUS:0032894249
SN - 0020-7519
VL - 29
SP - 77
EP - 91
JO - International Journal for Parasitology
JF - International Journal for Parasitology
IS - 1
ER -