An oxidative fluctuation hypothesis of aging generated by imaging H2O2 levels in live Caenorhabditis elegans with altered lifespans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Abstract Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important factors mediating aging according to the free radical theory of aging. Few studies have systematically measured ROS levels in relationship to aging, partly due to the lack of tools for detection of specific ROS in live animals. By using the H2O2-specific fluorescence probe Peroxy Orange 1, we assayed the H2O2 levels of live Caenorhabditis elegans with 41 aging-related genes being individually knocked down by RNAi. Knockdown of 14 genes extends the lifespan but increases H2O2 level or shortens the lifespan but decreases H2O2 level, contradicting the free radical theory of aging. Strikingly, a significant inverse correlation between lifespan and the normalized standard deviation of H2O2 levels was observed (p < 0.0001). Such inverse correlation was also observed in worms cultured under heat shock conditions. An oxidative fluctuation hypothesis of aging is thus proposed and suggests that the ability of animals to homeostatically maintain the ROS levels within a narrow range is more important for lifespan extension than just minimizing the ROS levels though the latter still being crucial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number33447
Pages (from-to)896-900
Number of pages5
JournalBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Volume458
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2015
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Caenorhabditis elegans
  • Hydrogen peroxide
  • Oxidative fluctuation hypothesis of aging
  • Oxidative stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An oxidative fluctuation hypothesis of aging generated by imaging H2O2 levels in live Caenorhabditis elegans with altered lifespans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this