TY - JOUR
T1 - An inverse elastic method of crack identification based on sparse strain sensing sheet
AU - Xiong, Zeyu
AU - Glisic, Branko
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Dr Y. Yao for providing experimental test data and analysis for strain sensing sheets, Dr M. Chiaramonte for providing instructions on finite element analysis (FEA), and D. Smith, E. Tung, N. Verma, Y. Hu, L. Huang, N. Lin, W. Rieutort-Louis, J. Sanz-Robinson, T. Liu, J.C. Sturm, S. Wagner, D. Sigurdardottir, and J. Vocaturo from Princeton University for their precious help. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials (PRISM), the Norman J. Sollenberger Fund, and the Princeton University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. The fatigue crack tests were in part supported by the USDOT-RITA UTC Program, grant no. DTRT12-G-UTC16, enabled through the Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT) at Rutgers University.
Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by the Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials (PRISM), the Norman J. Sollenberger Fund, and the Princeton University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. The fatigue crack tests were in part supported by the USDOT-RITA UTC Program, grant no. DTRT12-G-UTC16, enabled through the Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation (CAIT) at Rutgers University.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Reliable damage detection over large areas of structures can be achieved by spatially quasi-continuous structural health monitoring enabled by two-dimensional sensing sheets. They contain dense arrays of short-gauge sensors, which increases the probability to have sensors in direct contact with damage (e.g. crack opening) and thus identify (i.e. detect, localize, and quantify) it at an early stage. This approach in damage identification is called direct sensing. Although the sensing sheet is a reliable and low-cost technology, the overall structural health monitoring system that is using it might become complex due to large number of sensors. Hence, intentional reduction in number of sensors might be desirable. In addition, malfunction of sensors can occur in real-life settings, which results in unintentional reduction in the number of functioning sensors. In both cases, reduction in the number of (functioning) sensors may lead to lack of performance of sensing sheet. Therefore, it is important to explore the performance of sparse arrays of sensors, in the cases where sensors are not necessarily in direct contact with damage (indirect sensing). The aim of this research is to create a method for optimizing the design of arrays of sensors, that is, to find the smallest number of sensors while maintaining a satisfactory reliability of crack detection and accuracy of damage localization and quantification. To achieve that goal, we first built a phase field finite element model of cracked structure verified by the analytical model to determine the crack existence (detection), and then we used the algorithm of inverse elastostatic problem combined with phase field finite element model to determine the crack length (quantification) and location (localization) by minimizing the difference between the sensor measurements and the phase field finite element model results. In addition, we experimentally validated the method by means of a reduced-scale laboratory test and assessed the accuracy and reliability of indirect sensing.
AB - Reliable damage detection over large areas of structures can be achieved by spatially quasi-continuous structural health monitoring enabled by two-dimensional sensing sheets. They contain dense arrays of short-gauge sensors, which increases the probability to have sensors in direct contact with damage (e.g. crack opening) and thus identify (i.e. detect, localize, and quantify) it at an early stage. This approach in damage identification is called direct sensing. Although the sensing sheet is a reliable and low-cost technology, the overall structural health monitoring system that is using it might become complex due to large number of sensors. Hence, intentional reduction in number of sensors might be desirable. In addition, malfunction of sensors can occur in real-life settings, which results in unintentional reduction in the number of functioning sensors. In both cases, reduction in the number of (functioning) sensors may lead to lack of performance of sensing sheet. Therefore, it is important to explore the performance of sparse arrays of sensors, in the cases where sensors are not necessarily in direct contact with damage (indirect sensing). The aim of this research is to create a method for optimizing the design of arrays of sensors, that is, to find the smallest number of sensors while maintaining a satisfactory reliability of crack detection and accuracy of damage localization and quantification. To achieve that goal, we first built a phase field finite element model of cracked structure verified by the analytical model to determine the crack existence (detection), and then we used the algorithm of inverse elastostatic problem combined with phase field finite element model to determine the crack length (quantification) and location (localization) by minimizing the difference between the sensor measurements and the phase field finite element model results. In addition, we experimentally validated the method by means of a reduced-scale laboratory test and assessed the accuracy and reliability of indirect sensing.
KW - Structural health monitoring
KW - crack detection and characterization
KW - dense and sparse arrays of sensors
KW - indirect sensing
KW - inverse elastostatic problem
KW - phase field finite element method
KW - two-dimensional strain sensing sheet
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088563790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088563790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1475921720939518
DO - 10.1177/1475921720939518
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088563790
SN - 1475-9217
VL - 20
SP - 532
EP - 545
JO - Structural Health Monitoring
JF - Structural Health Monitoring
IS - 2
ER -