An intrapersonal addition paradox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

I present a new argument for the repugnant conclusion. The core of the argument is a risky, intrapersonal analogue of the mere addition paradox. The argument is important for three reasons. First, some solutions to Parfit’s original puzzle do not obviously generalize to the intrapersonal puzzle in a plausible way. Second, it raises independently important questions about how to make decisions under uncertainty for the sake of people whose existence might depend on what we do. Third, it suggests various difficulties for leading views about the value of a person’s life compared to her nonexistence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-343
Number of pages35
JournalEthics
Volume129
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An intrapersonal addition paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this