An Atypical Mechanism of Split Intein Molecular Recognition and Folding

Adam J. Stevens, Giridhar Sekar, Josef A. Gramespacher, David Cowburn, Tom W. Muir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Split inteins associate to trigger protein splicing in trans, a post-translational modification in which protein sequences fused to the intein pair are ligated together in a traceless manner. Recently, a family of naturally split inteins has been identified that is split at a noncanonical location in the primary sequence. These atypically split inteins show considerable promise in protein engineering applications; however, the mechanism by which they associate is unclear and must be different from that of previously characterized canonically split inteins due to unique topological restrictions. Here, we use a consensus design strategy to generate an atypical split intein pair (Cat) that has greatly improved activity and is amenable to detailed biochemical and biophysical analysis. Guided by the solution structure of Cat, we show that the association of the fragments involves a disorder-to-order structural transition driven by hydrophobic interactions. This molecular recognition mechanism satisfies the topological constraints of the intein fold and, importantly, ensures that premature chemistry does not occur prior to fragment complementation. Our data lead a common blueprint for split intein complementation in which localized structural rearrangements are used to drive folding and regulate protein-splicing activity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11791-11799
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Chemical Society
Volume140
Issue number37
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 19 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Catalysis
  • Colloid and Surface Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Atypical Mechanism of Split Intein Molecular Recognition and Folding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this